Monday, 1 May 2017

It's not what you do, it's the way that you do it - how Twitter caused Brexit


In 1780, a mob led by the half-crazed aristocrat Lord George Gordon stormed through London, shouting anti-Catholic slogans, demolishing buildings, setting free prisoners and - if Dickens can be believed in Barnaby Rudge - drinking molten lead from the roof of Newgate Gaol.

The Gordon Riots cemented the British establishment's horror of populism as the central plank of good government, and especially somehow anti-Catholic populism, which - as I have argued before - includes the sentiments behind Brexit.

The Nazi experience convinced the Left too that all emotion should be excised from politics, for fear of - well, to start with, for fear of the Mob.

The trouble is that this rendered the forces of good government all but powerless in the face of the skilled manipulation of emotion.

I don't mean Donald Trump, who is only using the clothes of populism to disguise an old-fashioned plutocrat. But Trump is also an example: his use of emotion was so crude that the only people it could possibly flummox was technocrats shorn of all feeling.

Unfortunately, that was all we had to defend the UK's involvement with continental Europe. The rest is history.

But it is a history that has yet to be written, and a fascinating report by the Radix thinktank this morning makes an important start. They used these assumptions about emotion and commissioned research from the University of Milan - analysing ten million tweets from the Brexit referendum and the Brexit debate since.

In fact, you could have predicted the result, they found, just by looking at the coherence and emotional content of the tweets - just as you could with the rise of Trump. The report All Atwitter about Brexit found that:

  • Besides having a greater intensity of use, the pro-Brexit camp has compelling leaders who use emotive messaging around a cohesive narrative that galvanizes supporters 
  • The anti-Brexit camp remains diffuse. There is no single leadership focus and a lack of a consistent, cohesive narrative that is capable of appealing to the emotional rather than the rational.
  • There is significant volatility among users around their Brexit sentiment. A large number of users still consistently shift between pro- and anti-Brexit positions 
  • Over the last few weeks, anti-Brexit sentiment has shown a sharp rising trend while the pro-Brexit community has shown slow decline 
  • The pro-Brexit camp has won the air war to date. But, as the general campaign starts, those parties and candidates that choose to make Brexit the defining issue in this election still have everything to play for.
That is extremely interesting. It means that, if you use Twitter as the way you analyse the way sentiment is shifting, it looks as though the energy is with those who want to stay entangled with continental Europe.

See my new book Ronald Laing:The rise and fall and rise of a revolutionary psychiatristGet ahead of the Mad to be Normal film when it comes out!

Subscribe to this blog on email; send me a message with the word blogsubscribe to dcboyle@gmail.com. When you want to stop, you can email me the word unsubscribe.

5 comments:

P Newsome said...

. "But Trump is also an example: his use of emotion was so crude that the only people it could possibly flummox was technocrats shawn of all feeling.

Unfortunately, that was all we had to defend the UK's involvement with continental Europe. The rest is history."
'
This passage is very confusing . Do you mean "flummox"? anyway it should be 'were' not "was". Is there a word "shawn"?

And what does "that" in "that was all we had" refer to?

Conall Boyle said...

"shawn of all feeling." Any relation to Shawn of the Dead?! OK typo for 'shorn'

Louise Alexander said...

I like to listen to debates as if I were a child and I felt at the time that there was more emotion and energy behind the Leave camp. By the same token, Corbyn could do well if he captures something of the public mood and isn't destroyed by the Murdoch press.

Canuk Greg said...

By your measure Scotland would have already left, even now ScotRef leavers dominate Twitter,the media had a 20yr head start influencing anti EU opinion, but Brussels ensured with micro management interfering with sovereignty. It was just supposed to be a Trade agreement.

Anonymous said...

But isn't Twitter a tiny, self-selected, completely unrepresentative sample of the electorate?